Volume 39 - Article 37 | Pages 991–1008
Life lived and left: Estimating age-specific survival in stable populations with unknown ages
By James W. Vaupel, Francisco Villavicencio
This article is part of the ongoing Special Collection 8 "Formal Relationships"
Abstract
Background: Demographers sometimes observe remaining lifespans in populations of individuals of unknown age. Such populations may have an age structure that is approximately stable. To estimate life tables for these populations, it is useful to know the relationship between the number of individuals at a given age a, and the number of individuals that are expected to die a time units after observation. This result has already been described for stationary populations, but here we extend it to stable populations.
Results: In a stable population, the population at a given age a is a simple function of the number of deaths at remaining lifespan a, the number of deaths at remaining lifespans a and higher, and the population growth rate. This property, which can be useful when ages are unknown, but individuals are followed until death, permits estimation of the underlying unknown survival schedule of the population and calculation of the usual life table functions and statistics, including the stable age structure.
Contribution: The main contribution of this article is to provide a formal proof of the relationship between life lived and life left in stable populations. We also discuss the challenges of applying theoretical relationships to empirical data, especially due to the fact that in real-world applications time is not continuous and some adjustments are necessary to move from a continuous to a discrete-time framework. Two applications, one with simulated data and a second with Swedish data from the 19th century, illustrate these ideas.
Author's Affiliation
- James W. Vaupel - Syddansk Universitet, Denmark EMAIL
- Francisco Villavicencio - Universitat de Barcelona, Spain EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
The threshold age of the lifetable entropy
Volume 41 - Article 4
On the relationship between life expectancy, modal age at death, and the threshold age of the life table entropy
Volume 51 - Article 24
Outsurvival as a measure of the inequality of lifespans between two populations
Volume 44 - Article 35
Onset of the old-age gender gap in survival
Volume 42 - Article 25
The impact of the choice of life table statistics when forecasting mortality
Volume 41 - Article 43
Coherent forecasts of mortality with compositional data analysis
Volume 37 - Article 17
In Memoriam: Professor Jan M. Hoem
Volume 36 - Article 24
Symmetries between life lived and left in finite stationary populations
Volume 35 - Article 14
Demographic characteristics of Sardinian centenarian genealogies: Preliminary results of the AKeA2 study
Volume 32 - Article 37
The Gompertz force of mortality in terms of the modal age at death
Volume 32 - Article 36
Maternal longevity is associated with lower infant mortality
Volume 31 - Article 42
Unobserved population heterogeneity: A review of formal relationships
Volume 31 - Article 22
The difference between alternative averages
Volume 27 - Article 15
Attrition in heterogeneous cohorts
Volume 23 - Article 26
Senescence vs. sustenance: Evolutionary-demographic models of aging
Volume 23 - Article 23
Total daily change with age equals average lifetime change
Volume 22 - Article 36
Survival as a Function of Life Expectancy
Volume 21 - Article 29
The age separating early deaths from late deaths
Volume 20 - Article 29
Life lived and left: Carey’s equality
Volume 20 - Article 3
Formal Relationships: Introduction and Orientation
Volume 20 - Article 1
The relative tail of longevity and the mean remaining lifetime
Volume 14 - Article 7
Lifesaving, lifetimes and lifetables
Volume 13 - Article 24
Oldest Old Mortality in China
Volume 8 - Article 7
Life Expectancy at Current Rates vs. Current Conditions: A Reflexion Stimulated by Bongaarts and Feeney’s "How Long Do We Live?"
Volume 7 - Article 8
Decomposing demographic change into direct vs. compositional components
Volume 7 - Article 1
Dr. Väinö Kannisto: A Reflexion
Volume 6 - Article 5
Cited References: 19
Download to Citation Manager
PubMed
Google Scholar